home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: node238.fc.net!goochb
- From: goochb@rwi.com (William D. Gooch)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.c,comp.object,comp.software-eng
- Subject: Re: Beware of "C" Hackers -- A rebuttal to Bertrand Meyer
- Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 13:00:15
- Organization: RothWell International
- Message-ID: <goochb.299.000D0181@rwi.com>
- References: <1995Jul3.034108.4193@rcmcon.com> <3taaha$p8j@ixnews3.ix.netcom.com> <RMARTIN.96Mar13110714@rcm.oma.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: node238.fc.net
- X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev A]
-
- In article <RMARTIN.96Mar13110714@rcm.oma.com> rmartin@oma.com (Robert C. Martin) writes:
-
- >Rabid worship of any language is inappropriate. Languages are tools,
- >no more, no less. However, rabid worship of C in particular does not
- >increase the probability that one is a hacker; since hacking is an
- >attitude with regard to the way tools are used, not an attitude about
- >*which* tools to use. Hacking is "Programming for the moment", as
- >opposed to "Programming for the Future"....
-
- Although I completely agree that language bigotry is foolish,
- there are many definitions of "hacking." Only recently have
- the terms "hacker" and "hacking" come to be used in such a
- derogatory fashion. I think we need to agree on spcific def-
- initions before we can really communicate using these terms.
-
- I personally prefer to think of "hacking" as "getting the job
- done, whatever it takes," which also means not letting OS
- or language limitations get in the way of success. Another
- reasonable variation is a kind of "exploring."
-
- cf Levy's book _Hackers_ for insight into the early use of
- these terms in computerdom. One thing this doesn't clarify
- is that even before the terms were used in computer parlance,
- the noun "hack" was in reference to a (usually good-natured)
- prank. (BTW, don't take Levy's presentation of the MIT culture
- too seriously - obviously he has never fully experienced it for
- himself, as his characterizations are quite stereotypical and
- simplistic.)
-
-